Post by ranibilkis88888 on Feb 18, 2024 0:32:43 GMT -3
To grow. “the saving of the rhinos was not because private owners could have ownership,” said sam ferreira, scientific officer for the african rhino specialist group of the iucn, the global wildlife conservation authority. “it was good biological management that created the opportunity for private landowners to own the property. “the success of rhino conservation opened up other opportunities to utilize other values for rhinos.” rhino economy over the past 15 years, the economics of rhino ownership have changed dramatically due to increased poaching, which economists attribute to rising income levels in major rhino horn-consuming countries in asia. Studies hav WhatsApp Number List e found that demand for rhino horn is both price inelastic, meaning that consumers do not substantially reduce their purchases even when the price rises, and income elastic, suggesting that as income increases of consumers, so does their demand for rhino horn said adrian lopes, an economics professor at the american university of sharjah. “as long as there is demand for rhino horn as an ingredient in traditional eastern medicine, there will continue to be an incentive to supply that market,” he said. The surge in demand has fueled the poaching epidemic that has seen rhino numbers on state land plummet. “of course we all want rhinos in places like kruger, but the reality is that it's not working, and the reality is that these private operations are contributing a lot in terms of numbers of rhinos across the continent now,” clements said.
She estimates that more than 50% of africa's rhinos are now in private hands . At the same time, the rapidly escalating costs of combating poaching have meant that fewer and fewer private owners can afford to keep rhinos, depressing the market for sales of live animals. Essentially, as costs for private owners increase, their potential income decreases. Hume previously paid up to $32,000 for a rhino, but said the same animal could be worth a tenth of that price today. Private owners in south africa have been around for a long time, from large private reserves seeking to get as close as possible to an intact natural ecosystem, to intensive captive breeding operations (cbo) models such as platinum rhino, predominantly focused on breeding and number. Around 28% of private owners are now getting rid of rhinos, most are doing their best to survive as is, and around 15% are doubling up and buying the rhinos from those who are going out of business, as hume did earlier, clemente said. “we are talking about money and of course many of the landowners in south africa who have game reserves with rhinos are not primarily motivated by money,” he said. “a lot of them are very motivated by conservation, but at the end of the day it has to be viable – money matters even if it's not the main goal.” el modelo platinum rhino in line with south africa's broader wildlife farming sector, where sustainable use is one of the key objectives, economic efficiency was a key rationale for hume's project design.
Our security is our greatest cost,” he said. “your security costs you per hectare, not per rhino.” this high cost of securing space was one of the main reasons hume chose to take a high-density intensive approach and keep the project's footprint as small as possible, requiring it to register as a cbo. Hume also chose to locate the project on the flat former agricultural lands of south africa's north west province to make it easier to secure. Research shows that smaller reserves have generally fared better against rhino poaching than larger conservation areas in the public and private sectors; it's simply easier to secure a smaller area. South african national parks implemented an “intensive protection zone” (ipz) within the kruger national park in 2016, a measure that then-environment minister edna molewa said reduced poaching by 20% . Aside from safety, hume's operation is also geared toward productivity, which in the context of rhino farming means maximizing the number of calves born and raised. The 8,500-hectare (21,000-acre) property is divided into three sections and 14 camps, with meticulous records of all matings, births and deaths. Twice a day, each section's camp leader takes a roll call of all the animals in his care and reports any activity to hume's full-time veterinarian, michelle otto.
She estimates that more than 50% of africa's rhinos are now in private hands . At the same time, the rapidly escalating costs of combating poaching have meant that fewer and fewer private owners can afford to keep rhinos, depressing the market for sales of live animals. Essentially, as costs for private owners increase, their potential income decreases. Hume previously paid up to $32,000 for a rhino, but said the same animal could be worth a tenth of that price today. Private owners in south africa have been around for a long time, from large private reserves seeking to get as close as possible to an intact natural ecosystem, to intensive captive breeding operations (cbo) models such as platinum rhino, predominantly focused on breeding and number. Around 28% of private owners are now getting rid of rhinos, most are doing their best to survive as is, and around 15% are doubling up and buying the rhinos from those who are going out of business, as hume did earlier, clemente said. “we are talking about money and of course many of the landowners in south africa who have game reserves with rhinos are not primarily motivated by money,” he said. “a lot of them are very motivated by conservation, but at the end of the day it has to be viable – money matters even if it's not the main goal.” el modelo platinum rhino in line with south africa's broader wildlife farming sector, where sustainable use is one of the key objectives, economic efficiency was a key rationale for hume's project design.
Our security is our greatest cost,” he said. “your security costs you per hectare, not per rhino.” this high cost of securing space was one of the main reasons hume chose to take a high-density intensive approach and keep the project's footprint as small as possible, requiring it to register as a cbo. Hume also chose to locate the project on the flat former agricultural lands of south africa's north west province to make it easier to secure. Research shows that smaller reserves have generally fared better against rhino poaching than larger conservation areas in the public and private sectors; it's simply easier to secure a smaller area. South african national parks implemented an “intensive protection zone” (ipz) within the kruger national park in 2016, a measure that then-environment minister edna molewa said reduced poaching by 20% . Aside from safety, hume's operation is also geared toward productivity, which in the context of rhino farming means maximizing the number of calves born and raised. The 8,500-hectare (21,000-acre) property is divided into three sections and 14 camps, with meticulous records of all matings, births and deaths. Twice a day, each section's camp leader takes a roll call of all the animals in his care and reports any activity to hume's full-time veterinarian, michelle otto.